盈彩网投资平台邀请码-互动百科

来源：盈彩网投资平台注册网2024-05-11 17:48

盈彩网投资平台邀请码

综述：中国北疆老树发新芽：新能源领域再造一个“工业内蒙古”******

　　中新网呼和浩特1月12日电题：中国北疆老树发新芽：新能源领域再造一个“工业内蒙古”

　　中新网记者李爱平

　　内蒙古自治区政府决定在新能源领域再造一个“工业内蒙古”。作此表述的是内蒙古自治区主席王莉霞。

　　1月12日，内蒙古自治区十四届人大一次会议在此间开幕，王莉霞作政府工作报告时这样说道。

　　作为中国煤炭大省，内蒙古煤炭产量约占全国的1/4、全球的1/8。王莉霞说，能源产业是内蒙古起家的产业，更是当家的产业，只应做大做强、不能做小做丢。她给出的思路是：全力推动传统能源和煤基产业老树发新芽。

　　在当天的政府工作报告中，她针对内蒙古传统能源未来发展表示，如果只是一味地在产量上做文章、不在产业上做文章，不把产业链拉长、转化率提高，就不可能改变简单“挖煤卖煤”的局面，煤炭、油气这些地下宝藏不能挖出来就拉走，一定要在内蒙古大地上转化增值。

　　她给出的建议是：支持鄂尔多斯建设现代煤化工产业示范区，加快布局一批新型煤化工项目，也要促进煤焦、氯碱、氟硅化工产业延伸融合，靠顶天立地的大项目和延伸细分的好项目撑起转化增值的新天地。

　　王莉霞同时认为，内蒙古要加强煤炭清洁高效利用，把淘汰落后机组转为应急和调峰机组，把传统燃煤电厂转为新型绿色智慧电厂。

　　在推动新能源领域中，内蒙古鄂尔多斯已经破局。

　　2020年12月引进落地的远景鄂尔多斯现代能源装备产业园项目，拟打造千亿级产值的绿色智慧能源装备产业园区。

　　记者从鄂尔多斯伊金霍洛旗政府获悉，该项目分三期建设，计划2025年全部实现量产。项目全部达产后可为超过3万台电动重卡提供高安全性、高能量密度、高耐久性和高性价比的动力电池，同时可解决可再生能源消纳难题，大规模降低电力成本。

　　王莉霞在当天作政府工作报告时表示，内蒙古要提高煤炭弹性产能和应急保供能力，加大油气资源勘探和增储上产力度，推动非煤矿产资源绿色安全有序开发。

　　她认为，现阶段新能源发展正处于一个历史性的“风口”，内蒙古必须按照新发展理念、全产业链思维，一手抓新能源开发建设，一手抓装备制造业发展。

　　记者获悉，未来，内蒙古要坚持以新能源带动新工业，加快大型风光基地和源网荷储、风光制氢等场景项目建设，力争并网装机2500万千瓦以上，建成拓展场景应用规模1000万千瓦以上。集中打造风光氢储产业集群和呼包鄂通装备制造基地，努力在新能源领域再造一个“工业内蒙古”。(完)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.